TECHNICAL REPORT: THE IMPACT OF THE BEN BRONZ READING CURRICULUM ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE FROM 1991-92 THROUGH 1997-98
Wells Hively, Aileen Stan Spence, Ian Spence and Susan Sharp

The Learning Incentive and Ben Bronz Academy

THE SETTING
Ben Bronz Academy is a school for learning disabled students in grades three through twelve. The school provides remedial programs in reading, writing, mathematics, language, study-skills and cognitive problem-solving techniques, together with content courses in science, social studies and literature where these basic skills are applied. The goal of the school is to help students attain skills needed to return to normal progress in public or private high school and college

THE POPULATION
Students come to Ben Bronz Academy because they have not succeeded in other schools. Most are identified in first grade, but they seek help outside the public schools in later grades, when it becomes clear that their needs are not being met. Although the students are of average intelligence, they all have been formally diagnosed as seriously learning disabled, primarily in the area of language processing.

THE READING CURRICULUM
The reading curriculum is described in detail elsewhere. Briefly, it consists of the following components:

Adaptation to individual students. In the small classes, teachers are able to sensitively assess each student's performance in recitation and homework, and identify those who can move ahead quickly or those who need additional resources. (Reading classes are scheduled at the same times of day so students can be easily re-grouped.) Slow progress on the daily, speed- reading practice sheets helps to identify students who are having difficulty. A senior staff member then observes these students and suggests changes in their programs. These changes may include: Teacher training. New teachers learn to teach the reading curriculum through pre-service workshops, video demonstrations and hands-on coaching by experienced staff. All teachers, old and new, are regularly observed in their classrooms. The observer follows a checklist of essential curriculum ingredients, and afterwards consults with the teacher to insure that these are all kept in place.

Periodically, teachers discuss individual modifications of the curriculum with their supervisors. Useful, generally applicable modifications are then discussed in faculty meetings, and, if they are approved, all teachers put them into practice. Everyone thoroughly understands that improvements are encouraged, but no one may make a change unless it is approved, and then everyone must make the change.

The staff strives for common procedures, not only in the remedial reading classes, but also in the content classes, so that students encounter consistency of methodology and expectations across the subject-matter areas. Wherever a student is confronted with print, the methodology of instruction in decoding and comprehension is the same.

All teachers are also trained in common and consistent classroom management techniques. These are designed to insure:

As with the curriculum itself, these social-management procedures are followed uniformly by all teachers, with adaptations and improvements approved and carried out by all.

In general, the model for teacher training is one of apprenticeship to a set of standard procedures, followed by collegial cooperation in systematically improving those procedures. This ongoing evaluation and improvement of instruction is supported by a computer system that enables collection of a wealth of daily data about the daily performance of the students.

More! | Return to Home Menu